Great Myths of the Brain (Great Myths of Psychology)
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
Great Myths of the Brain introduces readers to the field of neuroscience by examining popular myths about the human brain.
- Explores commonly-held myths of the brain through the lens of scientific research, backing up claims with studies and other evidence from the literature
- Looks at enduring myths such as “Do we only use 10% of our brain?”, “Pregnant women lose their mind”, “Right-brained people are more creative” and many more.
- Delves into myths relating to specific brain disorders, including epilepsy, autism, dementia, and others
- Written engagingly and accessibly for students and lay readers alike, providing a unique introduction to the study of the brain
- Teaches readers how to spot neuro hype and neuro-nonsense claims in the media
the “evidence is promising but not yet conclusive.” Further issues with EEG neurofeedback treatment for ADHD are raised in the latest edition of the book Science and Pseudoscience in Contemporary Clinical Psychology. In a chapter dedicated to neurofeedback for ADHD, Daniel Waschbusch and James Waxmonsky at Florida International University point out that the beneficial effects tend to be smaller or nonexistent in those studies that succeed in concealing from patients and their parents whether
dystopian tale about the dehumanizing effects of the Internet set in the year of the title. Writing for the New Statesman Helen Lewis suggested it may be the worst science fiction book ever written.106 “[F]or page after desolate page, nothing happens. Processions of characters simply tell the reader about how profoundly their lives have been affected by using digital technologies.” The fear mongering reached new heights in 2012,107 with a front-page splash on Newsweek magazine headlined “iCrazy.
work he reportedly collected severed heads from the guillotine and showed how applying electricity to the brain caused the faces to twitch. He performed his most theatrical demonstration of this effect in London in 1803, on the corpse of George Forster, shortly after Forster had been hanged for the murder of his wife and child. Galvani later showed that nerves contain fat, which supported his correct belief that they often have a fatty coating of insulation that speeds up the transmission of
believes that she suffers from a memory impairment, and her memory actually functions largely within the normal range, her condition would more accurately be described as pseudo-amnesia, not amnesia,” wrote Merckelbach and his colleagues. We've seen where movies give a distorted impression of amnesia, but let's also give credit where it's due. Baxendale highlighted three films for their accurate portrayals of the condition. Se Quien Eres (2000) features a realistic portrayal of Korsakoff's (see
understand human cognition is analogous to that of … trying to understand how a computer has been programmed.” Writing in 1980, the American personality psychologist Gordon Allport was unequivocal. “The advent of Artificial Intelligence,” he said, “is the single most important development in the history of psychology.”162 Where past generations likened the brain to a steam engine or a telephone exchange, psychologists today, and often the general public too, frequently invoke computer-based